Feedback

All in all, how do you rate the quality of the seminar? (1 poor, 5 outstanding) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

How experienced have you been with ROS prior to attending the Fall school? (1 poor, 5 outstanding) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

How useful has the Fall school been to your research? (1 poor, 5 outstanding) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

The number of participants was reasonable. (1 poor, 5 outstanding) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

The cost of the School was reasonable. (1 poor, 5 outstanding) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

The presenters' knowledge of the subjects in forenoons was good. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree)

1

2

3

4

5

The difficulty level of the forenoon lectures was appropriate. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Comments

Session I, Getting to know ROS: The difficulty level of the tasks were appropriate. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Session I, Getting to know ROS: The tasks were well prepared and well-chosen to give an insight. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session II, OpenCV / PCL object recognition: The difficulty level of the tasks were appropriate. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session II, OpenCV / PCL object recognition: The tasks were well prepared and well-chosen to give an insight. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session III, Manipulation and Grasping in ROS, Plan-based Control: The difficulty level of the tasks were appropriate. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session III, Manipulation and Grasping in ROS, Plan-based Control: The tasks were well prepared and well-chosen to give an insight. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session IV, Knowledge Processing: The difficulty level of the tasks were appropriate. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session IV, Knowledge Processing: The tasks were well prepared and well-chosen to give an insight. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session V-Part 1, SBPL Planning: The difficulty level of the tasks were appropriate. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session V-Part 1, SBPL Planning: The tasks were well prepared and well-chosen to give an insight. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session V-Part 2, Inferring Missing Objects: The difficulty level of the tasks were appropriate. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Lab Session V-Part 2, Inferring Missing Objects: The tasks were well prepared and well-chosen to give an insight. (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Required)

1

2

3

4

5

Which aspect of the workshop did you find most valuable?

Was there any subject matter missing from the workshop that should have been included?

How could the workshop/ format of the workshop be improved?

Industrial Day and 2-min Presentations - YES or NO?

Personal tools